Showing posts with label VD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VD. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

COVIDaphobia Mania Running Wild Again?!

Today (Tuesday, 19 July 2022) I saw this post on Facebook highlighting the heroic actions of one Elisjsha Dicken, who neutralized the Greenwood Park Mall shooter in Indiana as a benefit of exercising his individual, human, Constitutional right to own and carry weapons.

H/T "100% Anti-Democrat" Facebook page — Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 7:46 PM MST

OK, so the top part of the post is good to go —

Ison explained to WRTV, Dicken's first shot at the gunman was from 40-50 yards away and it appeared the very first shot hit the gunman.

Dicken was able to hit the gunman with additional rounds.

And more still —

Not the Bee
Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:08 PM MST

22-year-old Elisjsha Dicken neutralized the Greenwood Park Mall shooter within 15 seconds. He engaged the bad guy from 40-50 yards away and 8 of the 10 rounds he fired found their target. He has no CPL and was carrying a pistol under Constitutional Carry. He is not ex-military or police, and has no formal training. His grandfather taught him how to shoot. Raise a glass this evening to American hero Elisjsha Dicken.

OK, folks, this is the bizarre part —

NOWHERE in the text posted by the "Not The Bee" page's admin(s) is there ANY mention of the Beer Bug.

So did Facebook's "fact checkers" mistakenly attach a warning about Koof misinformation to this post?

Or maybe Facebook is trying to smear a story supporting the Second Amendment narrative by hook or by crook, using the approach of "throw your underwear against the wall and see if it sticks" ?


Thursday, June 23, 2022

Lindsey Graham's 30 Pieces of Silver, v. 2022?

It seems that Lindsey Graham, the "senior" Republican U.S. Senator from South Carolina, is getting his just rewards for supporting "common sense gun safety" legislation, namely "an agreement on principle for gun safety legislation Sunday, which includes 'needed mental health resources, improves school safety and support for students, and helps ensure dangerous criminals and those who are adjudicated as mentally ill can't purchase weapons.'"

Aside from the fact that Graham won't be up for re-election until 2026 (four years is almost an eternity where electoral politics is concerned), it seems that his recent "move to the center" in his quest to appease the hoplophobes and victim disarmers isn't quite reaping the rewards he wants (the hoplophobes and victim disarmers saying good things about him) —

H/T Steven Barnes — Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 1:33 PM MST

You see, instead of congratulating Graham for "moving to the center" and "meeting them halfway," the hoplophobes and victim disarmers are pissed at him for only giving them half a loaf, instead of the whole loaf and then some, such as outlawing civilian ownership of "assault weapons" such as AR-15-, M4- and AK-47-pattern rifles, and legalizing third-party litigation against gun manufacturers and retailers

So while Graham may get some accolades from the Necrotic Republican Association National Rifle Association for his pro-gun-when-it's-convenient rhetoric, I suspect that he won't get much traction with the rest of the right-to-own-and-carry-weapons crowd [GOA, FPC, etc.].

Ain't that a cryin' shame, now?

As they say in the South, "Bless your heart, Lindsey Graham."

Let's not forget that this isn't the first time that Graham has sided with the GOP's Invertebrate Caucus when it comes to defending the Second Amendment — he tried this sort of thing nine years ago.

Never mind that the proposed "universal" background check is the State demanding prior restraint on the exercise of a natural right — "How do we know that you're not an axe-murdering child rapist?!" — in other words, "prove your innocence first."

And, of course, the victim disarmers have included a plan for the federal Political Classholes to use your money tax dollars to bribe state-level Political Classholes to set up "red flag laws" (laws allowing someone to file a complaint against you and have your firearms taken away) in their states.

So what's their plan to take away the knives, axes, power tools, baseball bats, and anything else that can be used as a weapon from those alleged to be inclined towards criminal violence?

Oh, that's right, they don't have one. That's because their intent isn't to stop criminal violence, or to protect people.

As the infamous Senator Howard Metzenbaum said in 1989 —

"No, we're not looking at how to control criminals . . . we're talking about banning the AK-47 and semi-automatic guns."
— Constitution Subcommittee, 2 February, 1989

It’s interesting that in the places where the gun prohibitionist hold sway over the levers of power, it's not only firearms that are proscibed from possession by the Great Unwashed. They also prohibit private citizens who aren’t Political Classholes or in the employ of same to own or carry pepper spray, stunguns, tasers, switchblade knives, fixed-blade knives they don’t like, nunchuks, and batons. Now in New York State and California, they’re going after body armor.

Their intent is to render you and yours totally defenseless, dependent on your cell phone and ability to dial 9-1-1, and thus dependent upon them for protection, while regulating every aspect of your life.

Because they really do know better than you do how you should live.

For the Republicans who are on board, to whatever degree, with the hoplophobes and victim disarmers in the hopes of getting favorable media coverage, all I can say is "Don't need any support from me."

Bless your heart, Lindsey Graham. Bless your heart.


NOTES

  1. Published at The Libertarian Enterprise [TLE] — # 1,163 – Sunday, 3 July 2022 [v.1, v.2, Facebook group, Facebook page]

  2. Approximate reading level — 25.5

  3. Reposted —

    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — Bastyon / Diaspora* / Ello / Facebook / Gab / Gettr / gorf.pub / Minds / Spreely / Truth Social / Twitter / VK / Wimkin / Wordpress

    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page / Wimkin page

    3. Albuquerque Liberty Forum — Facebook page / Spreely page

    4. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page

    5. Egg McMuffin for President — Facebook page

    6. Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus — Facebook page / Spreely page

    7. New Mexico Dissent and Expose — Facebook page / Spreely page

    8. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook group / Facebook page / Minds group / Spreely group / Spreely page / Wimkin group / Wimkin page

    9. "No One Wants to Take Your Guns" — Facebook page / Wimkin page

    10. Resist Marxism New Mexico — Facebook page

    11. Stupor Bowl Sundae Feetball Shoot — Facebook page / Spreely page

    12. The Old Drunken Old Irrvelivents — Facebook page / Spreely page

    13. The Weekly SeditionDiaspora* / Facebook / Gab / Gettr / gorf.pub / gorf.space / Minds / Spreely / Truth Social / Twitter / Wimkin / Wordpress

    14. Vote Dumpster Fire — Facebook page

    15. Vote the Air — Facebook page

    16. Wood Chipper — Facebook page


Thursday, June 9, 2022

Don't Ask Why I Need an AR-15, Ask Why Cops Need AFVs

H/T Libertarian Party of Kentucky — Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 12:17 PM MST

"But wait, there's more!" as the televised pitchmen say.

Those same hoplophobe and victim disarmers who demand that you surrender your AR-15- and your AK-47-style rifles so that they can have their momentary "warm fuzzy" that they "got something done" and "made a difference" — their sock puppets in the New York State Legislature want New Yorkers that aren't Political Classholes or in the service of same to surrender any privately-owned body armor in their possession:

Reason: New York's Body Armor Ban May Be Stupidest Gun Legislation Yet


Thursday, May 12, 2022

Ironic that Democrats hate the only thing produced by socialism that actually works

H/T Libertarian Party of Jefferson County [Colorado] at Friday, May 6, 2022 at 9:29 AM MST [via Libertarian Party USA (Unofficial) Facebook group]


NOTES

  1. Reposted —

    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — Bastyon / Diaspora* / Ello / Facebook / Gab / Gettr / gorf.pub / gorf.space / Liberty.me / Minds / Spreely / Twitter / VK / Wimkin / Wordpress

    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page / Wimkin page /

    3. Albuquerque Liberty Forum — Facebook page / Spreely page

    4. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page

    5. Egg McMuffin for President — Facebook page

    6. KCUF Media — Facebook / Spreely / Wordpress

    7. Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus — Facebook page / Spreely page

    8. New Mexico Dissent and Expose — Facebook page / Spreely page

    9. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook group / Facebook page / Minds group / Spreely group / Spreely page / Wimkin group / Wimkin page

    10. "No One Wants to Take Your Guns" — Facebook page / Wimkin page

    11. Resist Marxism New Mexico — Facebook page

    12. Stupor Bowl Sundae Feetball Shoot — Facebook page / Spreely page

    13. The Old Drunken Old Irrvelivents — Facebook page / Spreely page

    14. The Weekly SeditionDiaspora* / Facebook / Gab / Gettr / gorf.pub / Minds / Spreely / Twitter / Wimkin / Wordpress

    15. Vote Dumpster Fire — Facebook page

    16. Vote the Air — Facebook page

    17. Vote the Air NM — Facebook page

    18. Wood Chipper — Facebook page


Copyright © 2022 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Monday, April 18, 2022

19 April -- ATF is America's Schutzstaffel

H/T GhostGuns.comSaturday, April 16, 2022 at 6:28 PM MST

Naturally, we can't forget Mike McNulty's Waco: The Rules of Engagement[1]

— and McNulty's follow-up film, Waco: A New Revelation[2]

Today we remember that on Monday, 19 April 1993, the Clinton Administration was so concerned about child welfare that they were willing to kill 27 kids by asphyxiation, incineration, and automatic-weapons fire to get at three adults accused of tax and paperwork violations.


FOR FURTHER REFERENCE

  1. Waco: The Rules of EngagementBing, DuckDuckGo, Google, IMDb, Infogalactic, Presearch, Searx, Startpage, Wikipedia

  2. Waco: A New RevelationBing, DuckDuckGo, Google, IMDb, Infogalactic, Presearch, Searx, Startpage


Copyright © 2022 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Monday, April 4, 2022

One-sided Shootout at Coronado Mall!

More "gun violence" at an Albuquerque mall on Thursday, 31 March 2022, as reported by the Albuquerque Journal, and reposted by the Journal to Facebook[1]

Five teens accused of beating at Coronado Center, by Matthew Reisen, Journal Staff Writer by Matthew Reisen, Journal Staff Writer

At least this time, no one seems to have been injured or killed as a result of shots fired.

Meanwhile, there have been several firearm-related homicides (involving shots fired at the victims) at other locations around Albuquerque — in the Downtown area, for example.

"Rbj Benjamin" posted a comment

Where’s our concealed carriers when you need them?

To which I replied

Concealed carry is not permitted on the property, per Coronado Center policy.

Blame Coronado for this one with their "No weapons allowed on site" policy, not concealed-carriers for their "failure" to be first responders to this incident.

And then there's my follow-up comment

So when Ross and Morales were allegedly pistol-whipping the Fuddruckers employees, should that be considered "gun violence" (firearm(s) were involved) or "blunt-object violence" (no shots were fired at that time) ?

ONCE AGAIN, we see just how "effective" this sort of "No weapons allowed" policy is (it is NOT effective, for those too dense to understand sarcasm) in stopping firearm-related crime.

As for the "gun free" status of Coronado (and Winrock, Cottonwood, etc.), if someone is injured or killed by a criminal there, and that injury or death could have been prevented had the victim been armed, I hope the victim or their survivor(s) sue the property owners into non-existence.

Something not yet brought up: Ross and Morales are both under the age of 21. This means their mere possession of handguns was a federal offense. ANOTHER failure of the victim disarmament statutes.

Apparently, I made a mistake — per 18 U.S.C. § 922(x)(2)[2], Ross was legal in possessing a handgun.

Still, Ross' alleged pistol-whipping of the Fuddruckers staff was definitely NOT legal, and would probably constitute battery, if not aggravated battery

30-3-4. Battery.

Battery is the unlawful, intentional touching or application of force to the person of another, when done in a rude, insolent or angry manner.

Whoever commits battery is guilty of a petty misdemeanor.

30-3-5. Aggravated battery.
  1. Aggravated battery consists of the unlawful touching or application of force to the person of another with intent to injure that person or another.

  2. Whoever commits aggravated battery, inflicting an injury to the person which is not likely to cause death or great bodily harm, but does cause painful temporary disfigurement or temporary loss or impairment of the functions of any member or organ of the body, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

  3. Whoever commits aggravated battery inflicting great bodily harm or does so with a deadly weapon or does so in any manner whereby great bodily harm or death can be inflicted is guilty of a third degree felony.

What's the takeaway here?

The lessons to be learned from this incident are as follows:

FIRST, victim disarmament edicts, whether they are in the form of public-sector statutes and regulations, or a private-sector "NO WEAPONS ALLOWED" policy, don't do much of anything to deter violent criminals from committing crimes.

If anything, they do the exact opposite — they make it easier for the criminals to victimize others.

Think of them as a sort of "workplace safety" code for the bad guys, making what are supposed to be "safe spaces" for shoppers and tourists into a  happy hunting ground for the crooks.

As the saying goes, "When seconds count, the cops are minutes away."

But . . . but . . . what about the "NO WEAPONS ALLOWED" sign? Surely, those intent on committing assault, battery, robbery, burglary, and possibly murder will see that sign, and then leave their guns in the car, right?

Well, you see, the criminal element always seems to find that massive loophole in all of the various victim-disarmament schemes called "breaking the law."

If they're willing to kill you over pocket change, what makes you think that they're going to obey your hoplophobic prohibitionary edicts?

As the saying goes, "When seconds count, the cops are minutes away."

And the reality of it all is this: You are your own best defender. Sure, you can contract the task out to someone else, but that person wants to go home to their family, too. That person will put their own personal safety above yours, if it comes down to it.


FOR FURTHER REFERENCE

  1. Albuquerque JournalFive teens accused of beating at Coronado Center, by Matthew Reisen, Journal Staff Writer by Matthew Reisen, Journal Staff Writer
    Published: Friday, April 1st, 2022 at 10:05 PM, Updated: Saturday, April 2nd, 2022 at 12:05 AM
    Facebook — Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 7:31 AM MST
    Retrieved Friday, 1 April 2022 and Monday, 4 April 2022

  2. H/T United States Concealed Carry Association [USCCA] — Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns. Retrieved Monday, 4 April 2022

NOTES

  1. Published at The Libertarian Enterprise [TLE] — Number 1,151: Sunday, 10 April 2022

  2. Approximate reading level — 12.9

  3. Reposted —

    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — BastyonDiaspora*ElloFacebookGab / Gettrgorf.pubgorf.spaceLiberty.meMindsRetalkSpreelyTwitterVKWimkinWordpress

    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook pageSpreely pageWimkin page

    3. Albuquerque Liberty Forum — Facebook pageSpreely page

    4. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook pageSpreely page

    5. Egg McMuffin for President — Facebook page

    6. KCUF Media — FacebookSpreely

    7. Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus — Facebook page / Spreely page

    8. New Mexico Dissent and Expose — Facebook pageSpreely page

    9. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook groupFacebook page / Minds groupSpreely groupSpreely pageWimkin groupWimkin page

    10. "No One Wants to Take Your Guns" — Facebook pageWimkin page

    11. Resist Marxism New Mexico — Facebook page

    12. Stupor Bowl Sundae Feetball Shoot — Facebook pageSpreely page

    13. The Old Drunken Old Irrvelivents — Facebook pageSpreely page

    14. The Weekly Sedition — Diaspora*FacebookGabGettrgorf.pubgorf.spaceMindsSpreelyTwitterWimkin / WordPress

    15. Vote Dumpster Fire — Facebook page

    16. Vote the Air — Facebook page

    17. Wood Chipper — Facebook page


Copyright © 2022 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Sunday, March 20, 2022

Help Yourself to an Abandoned Russian Tank? Why Not?

A few days ago, Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty [RFE / RL] re-posted a video clip ("Ukrainian Tractors Versus Russian Armor") on Facebook and YouTube

So when the hoplophobes and victim disarmers start screeching "u think you should be able 2 own a TANK?!?!?!!!!!!" because you support civilian ownership and carriage of handguns and military-pattern rifles, you can simply point to those Ukrainian farmers making off with abandoned Russian tanks, BMPs, and trucks.

Never mind that in the controlling precedent from American case law that "supports" their "argument," United States v. Miller, Justice James McReynolds said that the National Firearms Act of 1934 was "Constitutional" because the sawed-off shotgun possessed by Miller didn't qualify as a "militia weapon" protected by the Second Amendment because it didn't have "military utility."

Never mind that the sawed-off shotgun could be said to have "military utility" as it was in military usage by American and ANZAC troops in World War I in the Western Front trenches. Or that many military and law-enforcement agencies have been using short-barrelled shotguns as breaching and entry weapons for close-quarter-battle stuff for the past few decades.

Never mind that the AR-15-pattern and M4-pattern rifles that the hoplophobes and victim disarmers demand that you turn in for pennies on the FRN because they're "weapons of war" are almost functionally identical to the M-16 / M-4-type rifles used by the U.S. Armed Forces should also be protected by the Second Amendment as per U.S. v. Miller.

Never mind that in the same conflict that spawned the above-embedded video clip, the Zelenskyy Administration is handing out not only AK-pattern rifles and handguns (basically the same sort of rifles and pistols that the above-mentioned hoplophobes and victim disarmers want to take away from you) but also belt-fed machine guns and anti-tank rocket launchers to anyone who can carry them and is willing to use them to shoot at Russian troops.

Side note: I have one simple question for the hoplophobes and victim disarmers who are so bravely cheering on the Ukrainian civilian resistance, yet are so insistent that American civilians voluntarily disarm:

Why is OK for the Ukrainians to carry rifles, pistols, belt-fed machine guns and anti-tank rocket launchers, yet you have all sorts of problems with my owning or carrying my 9mm pistol here in the States?

Actually, I suspect that there are several reasons:

  1. The Ukies are OVER THERE — several thousand miles away, out of sight and mind, with plenty of terrain features, the curvature of the Earth, etc., between them and the local Starbucks, where I, on the other hand, could be right outside that same Starbucks. No chance of them being "triggered" by the sight of armed Ukies.

  2. The Ukrainians are shooting at Russians, who are operating under the aegis of the 21st century Hitler, Vlad Putin. Trump isn't a ready target for their ragefest, so they have to make do with Putin for the time being.

And it seems, contrary to what the First Drooling Child-Sniffer said in 2020, American private citizens DID own not only cannon but also warships in the 18th and 19th centuries[1].

The power of the sword, say the minority ..., is in the hands of Congress. My friends and countrymen, it is not so, for The powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from sixteen to sixty. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of Americans.
Tench Coxe, Letter to the Pennsylvania Gazette, 20 February 1788

Still, if you DO decide to get yourself any sort of tracked armored vehicle, have fun changing track segments and road wheels.


FOR FURTHER REFERENCE

  1. American Institute for Economic Research [AIER] — Private Cannon Ownership in Early America by Robert E. Wright. Retrieved Saturday, 19 March 2022.

    The Washington PostFact Checker ⋅ Analysis: Biden's false claim that the 2nd Amendment bans cannon ownership by Glenn Kessler. Retrieved Saturday, 19 March 2022.

    PolitiFactJoe Biden's dubious claim about Revolutionary War cannon ownership by Louis Jacobson. Retrieved Saturday, 19 March 2022.

NOTES

  1. Published at The Libertarian Enterprise [TLE] — #1,148: Sunday, 20 March 2022 [Facebook page]

  2. Approximate reading level — 13.7

  3. Reposted —

    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — Bastyon / Diaspora* / Ello / Facebook page, profile / Flote / Gab / Gettr / Gorf .pub, .space profile / Liberty.me / Minds / Retalk / Spreely page, profile / Twitter / VK / Wimkin page, profile / Wordpress

    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page / Wimkin page

    3. Albuquerque Liberty Forum — Facebook page / Spreely page

    4. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page

    5. Egg McMuffin for President — Facebook page

    6. KCUF Media — Facebook page / Spreely page

    7. Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus — Facebook page / Spreely page

    8. New Mexico Dissent and Expose — Facebook page / Spreely page

    9. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook group / Facebook page / Minds group / Spreely group / Spreely page / Wimkin group / Wimkin page

    10. "No One Wants to Take Your Guns" — Facebook page / Wimkin page

    11. Resist Marxism New Mexico — Facebook page

    12. Stupor Bowl Sundae Feetball Shoot — Facebook page / Spreely page

    13. The Old Drunken Old Irrvelivents — Facebook page / Spreely page

    14. The Weekly SeditionFacebook page / Spreely page / Twitter / Wimkin page / Wordpress

    15. Vote Dumpster Fire — Facebook page

    16. Vote the Air — Facebook page

    17. Wood Chipper — Facebook page


Copyright © 2022 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Tuesday, March 1, 2022

THIS is Why I Own and Carry Weapons

Reiterating the title of this post:

THIS is why I own and carry weapons wherever I can.

I'm 51 years old. I'm too old and fat to do a strip-tease for some death camp guard in order to snatch his / her / xis / xer / zis / zer sidearm away.

I'd rather have the option, at least, of taking out a bad guy with me as part of my going out of this plane of existence

Hertfordshire Friends of Israel
Sunday, September 22, 2019 at 4:00 AM

Arriving at Auschwitz in 1943, Polish-Jewish ballet dancer Franceska Mann was ordered to disrobe for the crematorium.

She took off her clothes provocatively to distract the Nazi guard, then snatched the roll-call officer's pistol & shot him dead.

She fired a second shot that wounded an SS sergeant. Other prisoners began a riot that was broken up when the guards opened fire with machine guns. Mann died on the spot.

But she stood up to evil and went down with a fight!

  


NOTES

  1. Reposted —

    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — BastyonDiaspora*ElloFacebook pageFloteGabGettrGorf SocialLiberty.meMindsRetalkSpreely pageTwitterVKWordpress

    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook pageSpreely page

    3. Albuquerque Liberty Forum — Facebook pageSpreely page

    4. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook pageSpreely page

    5. Egg McMuffin for President — Facebook page

    6. KCUF Media — Facebook pageSpreely page

    7. Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus — Facebook page / Spreely page

    8. New Mexico Dissent and Expose — Facebook pageSpreely page

    9. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook groupFacebook pageMinds groupSpreely groupSpreely pageWimkin groupWimkin page

    10. "No One Wants to Take Your Guns" — Facebook page

    11. Resist Marxism New Mexico — Facebook page

    12. The Old Drunken Old Irrvelivents — Facebook pageSpreely page

    13. Vote Dumpster Fire — Facebook page

    14. The Weekly SeditionFacebook page / Spreely page / Twitter / Wimkin page / Wordpress


Copyright © 2022 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Sunday, September 20, 2020

Messing About with Article II, Section 6

A few weeks ago, Albuquerque City Councilor Diane Gibson has gotten herself some no-charge campaign advertising, courtesy of the lamestream snoozemedia [1], on account of her calling for a State-level Constitutional Amendment to change Article II, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of New Mexico from its current text:

No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.

— to something that gives municipal and county governments more leeway to enact victim disarmament statutes:

No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons.

Considering that the sorts of victim disarmament statutes desired by Gibson and her hoplophobe cronies only disarm those who need to own and carry weapons the most — the five-foot, hundred-pound woman who's being stalked by her crazed six-foot, two-hundred-pound ex-boyfriend — and don't actually disarm the criminal and terrorist types one bit, those of us who support and exercise the individual, civil, Constitutional, human right to own and carry weapons for ".... for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes ...." would prefer that IF Article II, Section 6 must be amended, that it should read like this afterwards:

No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.


FOR FURTHER REFERENCE

  1. Albuquerque Journal — New vote sought on firearm provision

    KRQE News — Albuquerque city councilors seek new vote on firearms provision

NOTES

  1. Submitted to the Albuquerque Journal — Tuesday, 18 August 2020 at 8:57 AM

  2. Reposted —

    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — Diaspora* / Facebook page / Flote / Gab / Gorf Social / Liberty.me / Minds / Pocketnet / Spreely page / Twitter / VK / Wordpress / YouMe Social

    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page

    3. A Bias Toward Liberty — Facebook group

    4. Albuquerque Liberty Forum — Facebook page / Spreely page

    5. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page

    6. Freedom Rally Point New Mexico — Facebook group

    7. Gun Owners of New Mexico — Facebook group

    8. KCUF Media — Facebook page / Spreely page

    9. Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus — Facebook page / Spreely page

    10. New Mexico Dissent and Expose — Facebook page / Spreely page

    11. New Mexico Gun Rights — Facebook group

    12. New Mexico Lest We Forget (voters remorse) — Facebook group

    13. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook group / Facebook page / Minds group / Spreely group / Spreely page

    14. Resist Marxism New Mexico — Facebook page

    15. Sons and Daughters of Liberty New Mexico — Facebook group

    16. Split the State New Mexico — Facebook page / Spreely page

    17. Stupor Bowl Sundae Feetball Shoot — Facebook page / Spreely page

    18. The Old Drunken Old Irrvelivents — Facebook page / Spreely page

    19. The Weekly SeditionFacebook page / Spreely page / Twitter / Wordpress

    20. Vote Dumpster Fire — Facebook page

    21. Vote the Air — Facebook page

    22. Vote the Air NM — Facebook page

    23. Wood Chipper — Facebook page


Copyright © 2020 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Saturday, July 4, 2020

"No one wants to take your guns," v. July 3, 2020

From the Albuquerque Journal, Friday, 3 July 2020, p. A11 OP-ED ("SPEAK UP!")

KUDOS TO the Santa Fe County Commission for passing on the purchase of AR-15 weapons for the Santa Fe sheriff's department SWAT officers. . . . Instead of just waiting, as Sheriff Mendoza seems inclined to do because of "the current climate in the nation," I recommend the funds be redirected to a buyback and destruction of this type of weapon from civilians who have no legitimate need for them. AW


Copyright © 2020 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.